Quote:
Originally Posted by dr2005
*facepalm*
Seriously, Ben, you're better than this.
|
It's called sarcasm bro.
Also, there are people who actually talk like that. Check out the Brady Campaign, and try not to cringe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr2005
With respect, the saying about pots and kettles springs to mind here. Your version of events - that Martin was a 6'3" varsity football in prime physical condition pummelling the living daylights out of Zimmerman - is not one I have found a shred of source evidence for, yet you keep asserting it as fact. On the one occasion I have asked you to back up your account with sources, you have declined to do so. As such, in the nicest possible way, I would ask you put your own house in order as well.
|
http://loop21.com/life/stand-your-gr...orge-zimmerman
It's a well known fact by now man. The problem is the media keeps posting younger pictures of him in order to fill their monthly yellow journalism quota.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr2005
For my part, I feel the following may be worth reminding people of: the decision to charge Zimmerman means nothing more than that there is a case to answer and reasonable suspicion that an offence has been committed - in this case, second-degree murder. Until such a time as a jury decides one way or the other, the presumption of innocence still applies to Zimmerman and it is for the court, and the court alone, to determine whether he did indeed commit the offence as charged. As things stand, therefore, while his character may have been attacked (which could in itself give rise to actionable cause) I feel jumping to conclusions on his guilt in either direction, without full recourse to the evidence, is highly presumptive. I would therefore advise we all give the court space to do its work, see how things turn out and then go from there.
|
Exactly.