Quote:
Originally Posted by girlfromsocal
Serious injury... I didn't say he didn't get injured. There's a difference...
Or maybe Trayvon was acting in defense not attack
I mean you want so badly to make Trayvon the enemy.
You want to see trayvon in a certain light go on but I just don't see it that way.
yes it does motion cause and effect have to do with it...
Every action has a reaction.
And action is equal in force to that reaction.
Zimmerman had more force imo.
Therefore he had more ability to hurt trayvon.
Could you get used to the fact that not everyone agrees with you? This is a debate forum. It's likely I'll never be swayed by you.
|
I'm not trying to make him an enemy. I'm saying that these are the facts of the case, whether you like them or not, they are facts. Trayvon attacked Zimmerman. Fact. The media kept showing pictures of him at a younger age and making him out to be an innocent little kid when in reality he had just been suspended from school and was getting into trouble. Fact.
Again, you cannot prove that Zimmerman had more force. You cannot prove that he was stronger. You cannot prove that he had more ability to hurt Trayvon. That is also a fact.
I really don't give a damn that you disagree with me. You can disagree with me all you want. Everyone has their opinion, but this is a debate, and I am debating. I'm telling you how I feel about the case and responding to your side of the debate. That's how a debate works. I'm trying to get you to understand the facts of this case but you're not listening to or understanding a thing I'm saying.