[Pelios]

Originally Posted by MonsterCosmonaut

There's nothing we can legally do other than say that we don't need evidence. If you can't produce concrete evidence that someone raped you, you're dumb as fuck to think that anyone's going to believe you, and nobody should. The only way you can make these cases different is to find a reliable scientific way of telling, or to make it Guilty until proven Innocent. That's all there is to it. If there's concrete evidence that a person raped you, the courts have to accept that, but if there's no evidence, I don't know what you expect.. But on the other hand, the moment a man is accused of rape, his entire life is then over simply because there's anonymity for the accuser but not the accused, which is blatantly wrong; both should be held anonymous unless the accused is convicted.

We have that in our court systems. Guilty until proven innocent in other words you have to prove to the court you are innocent. With is absolutely ridiculous. I can go on and accuse you of raping me and if you don’t have money to get yourself a good lawyer (because the ones the court assigns you are the worst there is) there is a chance of 99.98% you will end up in jail. You also talk about the anonymous of the accuser and accused there is no anonymous on either side they “try” to keep the accuser anonymous but they don’t do a good job. There was recently a case were a girl was accusing a guy of rape I don’t know why this case became such a big thing on a national level but everyone knew where the girl lived, her full name, and every aspect of her live, the same with the guy been accused.
This post is mostly to inform you about the difference between your court system and the one here.