Quote:
Originally Posted by Guile
Ahh yes, the fearsome fighting forces of New Zealand, I cower in fear at the thought. They're about as scary as the SS, riding around in tanks with the death's head on their hats and destroying anything in their way with their fearsome gay battalions. Yes, after fighting the British, and winning, the Germans, and winning, the Germans again and wining, the Koreans, and winning, the Communists and winning, and... ohh wait I am talking about the USA, thecountry that doesn't let gays in. If some man ran up to me and started demanding my surrender in a lisp, sure, scary, but I'd die from laughing first, "Uhhhm excuse me, sir, I'm going to have to ask you to put fown your scary guns, it's not right to shoot people, mmmkay, so let's put them down and all be friends, mmmmkay doll?" Hahahaha..... But seriosuly, simply for bunking reasons it's not okay.
|
Leaving aside the woefully scant outlook of world military history you just gave there (War of 1812, Korean War being a stalemate, Vietnam War and Somalia), not to mention a distinct lack of awareness of the participation of the New Zealand Army in a number of conflicts (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zeland_Army), the US Armed Forces do allow
LGBT servicemen and servicewomen contrary to your assertion, even if they are not permitted to reveal their sexuality ("Don't Ask, Don't Tell" anyone?). The rest of your post is merely baseless stereotyping which warrants no comment whatsoever. In any event, nothing you have stated above demonstrates detriment to the armed forces I mentioned based solely on their decision to permit
LGBT servicemen and servicewomen. So if you have evidence, now is the time.