[Brandon]

Originally Posted by iHEAVENn

I'm not saying he should be convicted of it as they now don't have any one to testify against him. What I'm saying is, he has NOT acted like an innocent person and therefore comes across as guilty.

Different people have different interpretations of innocence. Just because he bullied and whatnot doesn't necessarily mean that there's a positive correlation between the bullying and whether or not he actually raped her. He could have bullied her for a completely different reason. It's suspicious behavior, potential evidence, but not a guaranteed "omgz...he bullied her...he must have raped her. OFF WITH HIS HEAD!" Unless they knew that he bullied her BECAUSE he raped her, then he's still assumed innocent on the rape, maybe not the bullying.