Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRoxS9
Therefore it is not alive, and abortion would not be killing it.
|
Huh? If it is not alive, then how is it managing to keep on growing? A can is not alive but a fetus is alive. Basic biology can show you that and if you say otherwise, then I'm wondering how much biology you know. The fact you then make claims about what is and is not an embryo, to me makes no sense and is mind-boggling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRoxS9
It would still be preventing the baby from existing, and I still disagree with it, but I think it is more acceptable. And I consider a fetus under six weeks to be an embryo, a sac of cells not breathing.
|
Since the scientific community, people in university taking science and in high-school taking science and taught, accept and acknowledge that an embryo is that AFTER EIGHT weeks, what do you label the thing as after six weeks? I'm not trying to be mean to you but it really shows you don't have an understanding of biology and if so, you should then stick to what is known and accepted, not make up your own terms on something you have little understanding of. To me and to others, it's confusing especially if we then introduce other terms because the timescale you're using is already off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PunkRoxS9
No it doesn't, but that doesn't change the fact that it can be done.
|
Correct.
It does however require proof that this occurs and when it does, proof that the receipient women usually (i.e. 50% or so) of the time pays for it. Since ShimmeringFaerie has also asked for proof or a source, the source you provide to her will hopefully be sufficient for this debate. However, I'll let this be because you're busy as am I but just remember that a source is needed.