[emma01]

Originally Posted by BabyIndia

What if you were to feed them before you went out but the child wasn't hungary? You'd take some sort of food with you.

My nephew is 2 years old, yes I know not my own child, but in the situation he may as well be.

If we are going out some place after dinner but he isnt hungary at the time, Im not going to not feed him whilst we are out. Thats wrong. If he's hungary he'd get fed where ever he may be.

It's a basic human right to be allowed food.

Some of you don't agree with breast feeding, but if you were in the situation: your baby is crying it's hungery, you forgot bottles, as you didnt think you were going to be out long, and you know baby likes breast milk any way, would you rush home to give the baby a bottle or would you breast feed?

Personally I'd breast feed, stuff what people think it's my body my baby, if i want to get my tits out i will, if it offends people then big wow, theres lots of nasty horrible things happing in this world to get offended at than seeing a baby latched onto a breast.

How many of you complain when you walk down a street on a night out, and girls have low cut tops on and might aswell have them out?

'Cos if your not offended by that then you shouldnt be offended by a baby feeding.

It also really annoys me the amount of people saying it's disgusting or it's wrong, I'd like someone to please point out to me how its wrong, because when breast feeding you can't see nothing as the babies head is hiding the nipple.

Grr

If the kid isn't hungry at the time, well isn't that just kind of tough. Some places don't allow food, for example some shops, you can't just bring out food then and there. And if its human rights to be allowed food, well next time im at school and im hungry, I will leave right in the middle of class! At pre-school even, kids have to wait until play lunch or lunch!

And ha, not always does the baby's head cover the breast! I have seen it many times and it is not pretty!