More evidence if you wish to read:
http://www.creationism.org/heinze/SciEvidGodLife.htm
http://www.newcreationstudies.org/Ne...htm#archeology
http://www.answersingenesis.org/
http://www.godandscience.org/
Again I am not the one questioning whether God is provable through science, you are.
It should make no difference whether these arguments are from my mouth or others. Because the evidence is there none the less. Saying you only want my opinion is this:
"I only believe the teachings of Richard Dawkins, and if he quotes other sources or gathers his information from others subjects then I guess I believe those too, but only in the context that Dawkins presents them. If he doesn't present it in his books then it either a) must not be true or b) doesnt understand it".
Scientist, Religious leaders, teachers, all recommend people to books. Just because they don't present the information doesn't mean they don't understand it. It simply means they don't have the time to present information that has already been presented.