Quote:
Originally Posted by Dasha
But your forgetting that this topic is NOT about how the earth was created or how old it is. This topic is about weather one can, fully believing in natural science, still believe in God.
Many scientists believe Jesus was in fact a real person whom did real things, they just find no PROOF besides the bible of Jesus being the son of God. They don't believe in the earth being only a few thousand years old because there is MORE proof for the earth being older than the bible suggests. Science is not about disproving the bible but finding the truth of the matter.
You can not walk up to someone, and tell them to read the bible so that they might believe. No, that is not how it works. You sit, and you talk to them with YOUR knowledge of the bible so that they might understand better. I don't think any atheist will go and read the bible with the wish to be converted. They must be shown and taught through the words of your own mouth.
|
The video disproves what scientists say about the earth being older than the bible suggest, using science, logics, the bible, and the Laws of Science.
See, I have provided verses in the Bible, and you put out the argument "I don't care what the Bible says, I care what you say". My knowledge of the Bible consists of what the Bible says. Just like your beliefs are based on what science says. And everything you say is quoted from a book, or a belief based off a book.
For example, all your ideas, everything you consist of, all your beliefs are based off of another mans observations and studies. And you adopt these ideas, because of what you are lead to be true. As is the same of mine. Although I believe mine comes from God, and you believe yours comes off observations by man. But whenever we make a statement it is off of our beliefs from what we are told.
If you disagree with this then, say you believe in evolution, you are simply stating that you created the idea of evolution, and I came up with the idea of the Bible.
Based off studies we need sources that are credible. I am not credible, but a professional as in the video is. The bible is credible. Science books are credible. Why? Because they have been around for time, they have been studied and examined. Although you may believe the bible isn't credible because you don't have faith, much like I don't have faith in man. But either way both must have credible sources.
You can say I believe that man evolved. I'll say great, provide me with evidence. So ultimately you will have to have credibility through other sources, which would be through a science book, or dawkins, or other scientists that prove your theory, in attempt to prove God doesn't exist.
I can say I believe God created man. You'll say great, provide me with evidence. Ultimately I will need credible sources, and my sources are based on the the Bible, and Christian Scientist who argue the point that Evolution couldn't possibly exist.
No matter who you are, you need sources. And this is a source I am using. I provided you with the words of another man, whether it's words coming out of my mouth or not it is irrelevant I am providing you with evidence against science.
And this is your argument:
"Well because you aren't saying the words yourself I can't believe it".