Quote:
Originally Posted by DoesThisLookInfected?
No it wasn't.
But I don't get why someone who NATURALLY loves someone shouldn't get married.
But marriage is no long a religious term, it's a legal term that gives you benefits
It's in the constitution:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
No law respecting a religion, i.e. not using religion as a backing point.
Then why shouldn't they be allowed to marry?
|
Wow...
-Yes, it was. Pick up a history book sometime.
-Because marriage is a religious ceremony.
-It is both.
-No, but religion sure can influence laws.