Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigmole
lvpeyton you do realize that you basically called children conqsequences of sex right. And if that is in fact true then you are calling every unplanned child out there a consequence, even if their parents were married at the time. Sex is not just for procreating I don't care what some old book says it's a necessary part of a relationship. I for one have yet to have sex, of course I've yet to be in a relationship, but I do plan to have it at some point before marriage because I would hate to be in a marriage where I'm not sexually compatible with my husband, that would suck and probably lead to cheating on his side cause I would never od that. So you're responsible, you use protection, a freak thing happens and you decide that having an abortion is the responsible thing for you, that sounds perfectly acceptable to me.
|
no, see this is where you are mistaken and need to take things in context. babies are not the only consequences of sex, correct me if i am wrong. there are also things like STD's. but, guess what? a consequence is not necesarily a bad thing, here is the definition for CONSEQUENCE from www.dictionary.com:
"the effect, result, or outcome of something occurring earlier"
okay? so pregnancy is the effect or result of sex! just like an STD is. STD = BAD CONSEQUENCE. PREGNANCY = GOOD CONSEQUENCE.
and i do NOT negate sex is not just for procreating. i have sex and i am not doing it to make babies, but guess what? if it happened- then i would have the baby! whether it was to keep or give to a family who doesn't have the luxury to have children of their own.
i guess everyone has their own idea of what responsibility really is. if you think it is responsible to have an abortion, fine. but i don't.