Quote:
Originally Posted by thebigmole
However I say that would you really sacrifice the life of a person for an animal, they are not equal.
|
You can believe what you want to believe, but I kinda have to point out that the logic of the line above is ultimately flawed. It should be more "would you really sacrifice nine months of 'pain' for a person for an animal." Because it's not a life for a life if there is no threat of death from pregnancy. It's kinda, would you kill an animal in order to have a pain killer? In which case, even in the worst amounts of pain I wouldn't kill an animal, if it was LIFE for a LIFE - yeah, survival is in our instincts.. but just to ease my pain? No, I'll go through it.
Also the remark was to comments of whether adoptees should have more say over adoption and it's impact than nonadoptees. You, if I remember correctly, had said women should have more of a say over pregnancy than guys because of experiences guys will never have. Same thing here, same logic applies.