Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
1. No, I'm not ignoring them. What I'm saying is there are other studies as well that run contrary to that. Based on what I feel in my heart, by how far I've regressed at certain moments I hold the other study to be more valid.
|
Please be so kind as to point them out to me? I'm pretty sure that any credible study supports what I've said. Though until I've seen them I can't say, got to keep an open mind y'know.
Quote:
|
2. The study wasn't operated by adoptees
|
I never said it was operated by adoptees. And which study?
Quote:
|
it was used in a book about adoptees as to explain why we have PRIMAL feelings for a woman we've never even met. You're ignoring these studies.
|
What studies? And what possible relevance could studies pertaining to the feelings adopted children have towards their biological parents have on a debate about the morals, necessity and "wrongness" of abortion?
Quote:
|
3. It should be the people's choice, taking every information they have and making the best informed decision. Hopefully they make the one I consider right, they may not - it's not for me to force them, but I can openly judge anyone based on my own beliefs.
|
So who's "choice" should it be if there is a disagreement about the abortion if there is no legal guidelines? What you have described is how abortion currently is more or less but with the legal guidelines which ensure that everyone DOES get a choice. To have a system of laissez-faire abortion seems at best irresponsible and at worst negligent on behalf of any government.