[losing touch.]

Originally Posted by PhoenixAlive

So put the kid up for adoption! If a woman gets pregnant (and if there aren't huge extenuating circumstances ex- rape, serious medical risk) she has a responsibility to allow the life she created to fulfill itself.

says who? that might be your opinion, but if she doesn't feel that it's her responsibility to do that then it's no one elses business.

Originally Posted by PhoenixAlive

Just because she can't take care of the baby doesn't mean that she can't do the responsible thing and put the child up for adoption. TO THE BABY THIS IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH!

hmm well the way i see it, so long as the baby is aborted early on in the pregnancy it's not a baby, it's only a bunch of cells.. so you're killing a bunch of cells, not a person. and as for the adoption thing, i've already said.. i'm not against adoption! what i am against is a woman being forced to go through a pregnancy that she doesn't want.

Originally Posted by PhoenixAlive

And unless there are huge medical problems, pregnancy is really not that big of a deal. Sure its not fun. I know from personal experience that it can get very unpleasant, but its not bad enough to justify taking a life away just because its inconvenient.

i disagree. "pregnancy is really not that big of a deal." - i don't see how you can say that. it's a completely life changing experience from which you have a child.. and some people may not be able to contemplate the thought of adoption, yet they can't look after the baby themselves, hence abortion is the best option for all parties.