Thread: My Rant About Science vs. Religion
View Single Post
  (#25 (permalink)) Old
Adean Offline
Almost 4000 posts.
Regular TeenHelper
*****
 
Adean's Avatar
 
Name: Mary
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Location: Columbus, Ga

Posts: 391
Points: 11,598, Level: 15
Points: 11,598, Level: 15 Points: 11,598, Level: 15 Points: 11,598, Level: 15
Blog Entries: 1
Join Date: January 5th 2009
Re: My Rant About Science vs. Religion - April 5th 2009, 06:23 AM
It's not just the taking of two animals. All the fowls of the heavens? How would Noah sustain an ark that size? Especially if water flooded over a sill (not rained) for 300 days like the theory suggested?

Plus, '"For the Noah's Ark Hypothesis to be correct, one has to speculate that there was no flowing of water between the Black Sea and the Marmara Sea before the speculated great deluge. We have found this to be incorrect."'

Like if it is meant to be a legend or metaphorical, then that's fine. If it's just a region that flooded, I'm a bit more okay with that. There's another theory that they based it off of a king who built a barge and floated down a flooded river. I don't remember which river or where though.

Like there's nothing wrong with an inspiring story.

Beware of the cats.
Last edited by Adean; April 5th 2009 at 06:30 AM.