Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTank77
You do realize that Trayvon was smashing the man's head into the pavement and that beyond the bullet wound, he had no wounds except for offensive wounds on his hands, right? That both the police and medical reports also corroborate his side of the story, and that beyond speculation, the Prosecution has very little to refute what the defense is putting forward?
He's going to walk. Prosecution had a long shot with manslaughter, but they chose to make it a trial of public opinion and went with 2nd Degree Murder, the statute of which doesn't fit this crime in the slightest.
|
A middle aged man chases a teenage boy
when police told his jive ass not to.
My opinion of what went down:
*Zimmerman confronted Trayvon asking why he was in the neighborhood. Probably racially profiling him and provoking the situation.
Trayvon was defending himself like Zimmerman claims he was defending himself despite being armed and heavier.
Zimmerman keeps changing his story. First Trayvon slammed him on the ground, then Trayvon reached for his gun, then Trayvon ran and Zimmerman tackled him. Which story is true?
At the end of the day, Zimmerman disobeyed police so therefore he is going to fry. Mark O'Mera is a terrible attorney. Why is he trying to postpone the trial date from a few weeks from now? Explain that one?
Plus the defense isn't doing stand your ground which basically would have made Zimmerman's chances of freedom higher.
Zimmerman is going to be found guilty given 15 years minimum.