![]() |
Rape Is Natural
I've been rather busy these past few weeks and failed to reach my monthly quota last months for "people pissed off". So I figured I might as well take care of this month, and retroactively last month, lest I make the bossman any more mad.
All humor aside, mega-trigger thread, be warned. Let's avoid the evolution debate here, so just bear with me and can we all agree, pretend, or shut-up and agree that evolution happens under current scientific understanding. Pre-Agriculture Agriculture wasn't so much discovered as it was made practical. The big hitch to agriculture wasn't how to actually preform it, but how to store it. Agriculture is calories invested for a larger gain in the end, paying out at a single instant in time. That being two seasons invested in farming for a payout of four seasons worth of food. Unfortunately, this is not something that you get over time, but at harvest time, where you get your "payment" in a lump sum. Because of that you need to store it for the next year until harvest season comes around again. On the other hand, hunting is a short period of work, for a small, immediate, reward, that will be consumed before it could go bad. As a result, hunting served as the primary means for survival for thousands of years, until adequate storage was invented. Because of this the idea of "my" was virtually nonexistent in pre-agrarian societies. Even in more modern times, such as the Native Americans, there was very little ownership (they having had very rudimentary farming). They didn't believe you could own land, and most personal property was no more then one could carry on their back. Compared to the Europeans and such who had a very strong idea of "My, mine, ours", who also had a tradition of agriculture. All of this comes back to, rape was most likely far less traumatic in pre-agrarian societies, and even early-classical era societies. This being a result of their lack of ownership, not only of property, but the self, and their lack of preconceived ideals of human rights (artificial constructs). The major trauma experienced by victims now, is a result of our artificial notions of ownership, from property, to more specifically, our person, and rights as a person. Genetic Implications Human sexual patterns are a result of evolution and genetic factors, society and law are used as a means to equal the playing field and maintain order. Men invest extremely little in reproduction, with nearly three million sperm gametes per ejaculation it's a "theoretical" three million children that one could create (of course in practicality that's an impossibility). Women on the other hand invest a good deal, with only one egg per cycle, and a nine month pregnancy, plus risk of death in childbirth, they want to be far choosier with their mates then men. When a man reproduces he has no physical obligation to the child, as he could impregnate any number of women in a short period of time, and it's in his genetic interest to do so, as it ensures the survival of his genes to the next generation. Why put all your eggs in one basket (or your sperm in one woman :hehe: ) when you could invest very little in having many women and therefore a likelier chance of continuing your genetic legacy. Those sexual patterns mentioned before exist because take pedophilia and homosexuality, it's (from a genetic point of view), nonbenificial, you can't reproduce with a child, nor can you with a person of the same gender, so those factors have been bred out to a small segment of the population, as opposed to the men interested in pubescent and upwards girls who were able to reproduce. Also interesting is that most rapes occur to women of childbearing age (80% being under the age of 30, and 9/10 of victims are women, and only 15% of rapes occurring to prepubescence individuals), even though they would be the most fit to resist. If rape were simply about dominance then it would be odd to choose victims so capable to fighting back. One must also consider the low percentage of violence in most rapes (of forcible rape, 84% didn't involve physical injury), even those that are forced, as for a man, it would be a bad idea to injure the person who would be carrying your genes to term. At the same time, for the woman, it would be best to resist as little as possible, lest she risk injury, and therefore, death. Theoretically then, humans are descended from the men who raped the most, and the women who fought back the least. Rape is also observable in many species, from humans to primates to hundreds and hundreds of mammals. Rape fantasies are also the most common human fantasy, over half of college aged women have rape fantasies. The final idea here is, rape is just about sex, and theories of "dominance motive" are simply feminist fallacies. LOVE YOU ALL, HAVE FUN!!! |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Interesting way of putting it
Whilst what you say is true, we are a modern society, and - for the most part - more civilised than the first humans. In any case, it is generally considered morally wrong to rape someone in today's society, and I agree for the reasons you give about the risks of childbirth. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Guile: However, people also once bashed each other's skulls in with rocks over anything from stealing food, to trespassing. This means those who were best at killing and defending were the ones who survived.
On a evolutionary scale, animals develop the concept of personal ownership before they understand the ownership of others, that means that stealing must be natural as well. By this definition, the people who stole the most must've been the ones to survive. Rape was natural at one point, all free range chickens are a product of rape, as chickens aren't intelligent enough to understand consensual sex. However with the way our modern world is crafted, society would break down just as it would if killing/stealing were suddenly legal. It would also break down if rape were suddenly legal. It's also worth noting we, as human beings are smarter than free range chickens. Just as men don't fight to the death over territory as male chickens do, human men don't rape, as we simply know better. Also worth noting, upon being castrated, male sex offenders generally move on to different violent crimes. Ben posted and interesting study a while back, if he doesn't find it/post it first, I'll dig it up. - Justin |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
What I am arguing though, is that rape is about sex, not dominance, as feminists lead you to believe. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Guile: True, but your average run-of-the-mill Joe isn't going to rape someone just because he hasn't got any in a few months.
I'd speculate it's attributed to two things: 1. Yes, dominance. This would explain the cases where offenders went on to other violent crimes upon castration. 2. Lack of control caused by a variety of things from mental disorder to simply being less evolved. Anyhow, very interesting topic. - Justin |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Personally, I think that the thing I found most interesting is that, whatever points and counterarguments are made, the OP makes perfect sense!
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
I could be wrong, but I could've sworn there was a correlation between a certain percentage of male rapists having had parental (or more specifically mother) issues during childhood and subsequent misogynistic power/dominance issues. Not that the idea of the feminists blowing things out of proportion (or to quote Kenji, "a feminist conspiracy!") is necessarily implausible, but it does make sense that at least some rapists would be motivated by the aforementioned personality traits. Misogyny is real, and it's certainly not a stretch to imagine that someone growing up with an abusive or neglectful mother might end up hating women later in life, and want to exert some form of vindictive dominance over them.
http://i.imgur.com/6AoGM.jpg |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
The rape is almost entirely about sex, they want it, and due to poor impulse control, they just take it. Yes, some are about dominance, but I think those ones are more into the mental area, because they're trying to fill an emotional and mental void. 2. No argument here. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
If a person is heinous enough to be a rapist, they will not have the moral capacity to know the difference between sex and dominance. They will see them as one and the same.
And, going back to your original post... Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
Sure, sometimes, occasional oddity and fluke, but overall the simplest answer is the best, sex is the reason for forced sex. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
Sure for everything you could go on, "People steal money because they want money/goods"* *Except in the cases of revenge, where they feel slighted, where the person deserves it, martyr, robin hood-ing, etc. Overall though the point here is that, it's not the typical "MYSOGONY ERHMAGAHDS" reason that we've all heard, it's about sex. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Are we attempting to make legal arguments here? Rape is not unnatural, fine, but it is still illegal. Rape is not about dominance, fine, I can accept that, but that doesn't make it any less illegal or immoral. It's about sex, fine, that's cool, I can accept that also. Well, I can accept that on one premise: murder is not unnatural (excuse the double negative; "it is natural" would give a different impression) and is about killing someone; assault and battery are not unnatural and are about direct contact with someone; statutory rape is not unnatural and is about dominance; sexual assault is not unnatural and is about getting to touch or grope someone's privates (ew, cooties).
See what I'm getting at? Point is, at law, you don't need a specific motive to commit a crime. You only require the motive to perform the non-mens rea elements of the crime. Whether it's about dominance or sex, it doesn't matter - the main thing is that you intended to perform the elements that constitute the crime. And further, "rape" itself is strictly a legal concept. I wouldn't go so far as to devise a motive for any social or psychological aspects of it. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
If rape is about sex, then it would suggest there might be some basis in telling women not to dress a certain way because it would attract a potential rapist more than dressing conservatively would.
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
I'd be interested in seeing if there are statistics available showing the different forms of rape that are reported, i.e. vaginal and/or anal. Because, while those are all grouped into the broad category of "rape," pregnancy and reproduction is obviously not going to be an expected outcome of anal sex, and that doesn't really lend any support for your theory. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
I agree though, I don't see how pedophilia is genetically beneficial. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Overall, interesting debate. |
Re: Rape Is Natural
I can agree that rape might have been natural at some point but it is and has to be one thing on a long list of natural things that we humans used to do but we've stopped doing now, but we stopped doing when our beloved intelligence came around. Sure, before we started making fires to cook our food, herding animals rather than hunting them and learned how to build our own shelters, then rape might have been an "okay" way to go about it, but I'm fairly certain we can all agree that we've moved along from this now, and that women have evolved a strong enough sense of self to be allowed to decide who should be allowed to put their seed in her one and only egg. :)
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
Oh mighty, I obviously know that women have more than one egg through their lifetime, but as I was building on (possibly poorly) the argument made in the first post about the amount of extra work and and sacrifice a woman has to put into a pregnancy as opposed to a man (as we're only able to have one kid going for us at the time, and it takes nine months, and the fact that we have _one egg at the time, and then it bleeds out and we get a new one. Pretty much. Don't worry, I go through this enough to have at least a basic understanding of what I'm talking about (but of course I'm not a biologist)) I think you might have misunderstood the argument I was making; rape happened before, and I understand what it happened before and I'm more ... okay with it happening before. Of course it didn't happen for everyone and every single mating that happened wasn't a rape, but back then it was considered natural. I'm not okay with rape happening today. At all - but I'm very aware of its continued existence. We're in an intelligent society (believe it or not), and yes, rape does happen, but we should know and understand better than that by now : ) |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
Bring back rape and fighting for mates? :hehe: |
Re: Rape Is Natural
Your first post actually makes sense. However I'd say that there isn't rape that's ONLY just for sex. Because if a guy really wants sex, that's what hookers are for.
|
Re: Rape Is Natural
Quote:
I myself am very averse to the idea of American hookers, they're a hotbed for STDs and drugs, I'd honestly be less worried for my personal health/safety in a rape then I would hiring a hooker. Isn't that just sad? (Let's not start a war here on why we need to legalize prostitution though) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search engine optimization by vBSEO.
All material copyright ©1998-2025, TeenHelp.
Terms | Legal | Privacy | Conduct | Complaints | Mobile